Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 14 de 14
Filter
1.
JAMA Cardiol ; 8(5): 417-418, 2023 05 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-20233385
2.
JAMA Cardiol ; 7(6): 612, 2022 06 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1925850
3.
JAMA Cardiol ; 7(5): 479-481, 2022 05 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1913737

Subject(s)
Cardiology , Humans
7.
Prog Cardiovasc Dis ; 63(5): 682-689, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-974476

ABSTRACT

The Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) is now a global pandemic with millions affected and millions more at risk for contracting the infection. The COVID-19 virus, SARS-CoV-2, affects multiple organ systems, especially the lungs and heart. Elevation of cardiac biomarkers, particularly high-sensitivity troponin and/or creatine kinase MB, is common in patients with COVID-19 infection. In our review of clinical analyses, we found that in 26 studies including 11,685 patients, the weighted pooled prevalence of acute myocardial injury was 20% (ranged from 5% to 38% depending on the criteria used). The plausible mechanisms of myocardial injury include, 1) hyperinflammation and cytokine storm mediated through pathologic T-cells and monocytes leading to myocarditis, 2) respiratory failure and hypoxemia resulting in damage to cardiac myocytes, 3) down regulation of ACE2 expression and subsequent protective signaling pathways in cardiac myocytes, 4) hypercoagulability and development of coronary microvascular thrombosis, 5) diffuse endothelial injury and 'endotheliitis' in several organs including the heart, and, 6) inflammation and/or stress causing coronary plaque rupture or supply-demand mismatch leading to myocardial ischemia/infarction. Cardiac biomarkers can be used to aid in diagnosis as well as risk stratification. In patients with elevated hs-troponin, clinical context is important and myocarditis as well as stress induced cardiomyopathy should be considered in the differential, along with type I and type II myocardial infarction. Irrespective of etiology, patients with acute myocardial injury should be prioritized for treatment. Clinical decisions including interventions should be individualized and carefully tailored after thorough review of risks/benefits. Given the complex interplay of SARS-CoV-2 with the cardiovascular system, further investigation into potential mechanisms is needed to guide effective therapies. Randomized trials are urgently needed to investigate treatment modalities to reduce the incidence and mortality associated with COVID-19 related acute myocardial injury.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/virology , Heart Diseases/virology , Heart/virology , Hospitalization , SARS-CoV-2/pathogenicity , COVID-19/complications , COVID-19/diagnosis , Diagnosis, Differential , Heart/physiopathology , Heart Diseases/diagnosis , Heart Diseases/physiopathology , Heart Diseases/therapy , Host-Pathogen Interactions , Humans , Predictive Value of Tests , Prognosis , Risk Factors
8.
JAMA ; 324(12): 1131-1132, 2020 09 22.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-804225
10.
JAMA Cardiol ; 5(10): 1163-1164, 2020 10 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-607325
11.
Eur Heart J ; 42(1): 113-131, 2021 01 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-209573

ABSTRACT

Systemic vascular inflammation plays multiple maladaptive roles which contribute to the progression and destabilization of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). These roles include: (i) driving atheroprogression in the clinically stable phase of disease; (ii) inciting atheroma destabilization and precipitating acute coronary syndromes (ACS); and (iii) responding to cardiomyocyte necrosis in myocardial infarction (MI). Despite an evolving understanding of these biologic processes, successful clinical translation into effective therapies has proven challenging. Realizing the promise of targeting inflammation in the prevention and treatment of ASCVD will likely require more individualized approaches, as the degree of inflammation differs among cardiovascular patients. A large body of evidence has accumulated supporting the use of high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) as a clinical measure of inflammation. Appreciating the mechanistic diversity of ACS triggers and the kinetics of hsCRP in MI may resolve purported inconsistencies from prior observational studies. Future clinical trial designs incorporating hsCRP may hold promise to enable individualized approaches. The aim of this Clinical Review is to summarize the current understanding of how inflammation contributes to ASCVD progression, destabilization, and adverse clinical outcomes. We offer forward-looking perspective on what next steps may enable successful clinical translation into effective therapeutic approaches-enabling targeting the right patients with the right therapy at the right time-on the road to more individualized ASCVD care.


Subject(s)
Acute Coronary Syndrome , Atherosclerosis , Cardiovascular Diseases , Myocardial Infarction , Acute Coronary Syndrome/drug therapy , Biomarkers , C-Reactive Protein/analysis , Cardiovascular Diseases/prevention & control , Humans , Inflammation
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL